News
![Andrews & Andrews Construction Pty Ltd v Yao; Yao v Andrews & Andrews Construction Pty Ltd [2025] NSWSC 322](https://9selborne.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/NMM-ARZ-Linkedin.jpg)
![Naaman v Jaken Properties Australia Pty Limited & Ors [2025] HCA 1](https://9selborne.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/High-Court.jpg)
![Liprini v Thirdi William Street Pty Ltd [2023] NSWSC 1375](https://9selborne.com.au/wp-content/plugins/wp-latest-posts/img/default-image.svg)
David Knoll regularly presents updates for the profession in the field of Strata and Community Title. His most recent paper, presented on 6 March 2024 at the Australian College of Strata Lawyers 2024 conference was entitled: “Liability for Breach of Statutory Duty”. The focus was primarily on water ingress cases and the capacity of Tribunals to award damages to lot owners, which differs across the Australian States and Territories. A pdf extract can found be here.
Michelle Painter SC receives a feature in the The Australian Financial Review's latest article “Justice of the Piece”.
Her curated chambers and collection of Asian-origin headpieces are displayed alongside the grand collections of The Hon Chief Justice Andrew Bell, The Hon Justice John Sackar KC, The Hon Justice Richard Weinstein SC and Laina Chan of 2 Selborne Chambers.
Explore the collections of the Bench and Bar in the full article here.
Adrian Maroya’s recent victory in the NSWSC appearing for the Rooty Hill Pigeon Racing Club has been reported on in the The Sydney Morning Herald.
Seventeen plaintiffs brought a claim against the defendant, the Rooty Hill and District Pigeon Racing Club Inc (the Club). The plaintiffs sought a declaration that each of them was a member of the Club, on the basis that (despite most of them not having been involved in the affairs of the Club nor having paid annual membership fees for many years) and an order invalidating the adoption in 2017 by the club of a new constitution.
The plaintiffs alleged that the rules of the Club contained express terms including, in particular, that “a person ceases to be a member of the association if the person – (a) dies; (b) resigns that membership; or (c) is expelled from the Association. The plaintiffs next alleged that each plaintiff became a member of the Club, and that each plaintiff had not died, resigned from membership nor been expelled: thereby remaining members of the Club (despite the non-payment of fees).
By its defence, the Club contended that, even if certain of the plaintiffs had at one time been members the Club, they had ceased to be members by reason of non-payment of membership fees, many years’ inactivity and non-involvement with the Club’s affairs.
Justice Robb dismissed all the claims, save for the first plaintiff’s, in a detailed judgment containing important insights into the law of incorporated associations, membership rights and abandonment of membership, noting ([97]) that: “it seems to be entirely logical that, when a member of an association has not resigned in compliance with the formalities contained in its constitution, but over a long period of time has by the member’s conduct sufficiently manifested an intention to cease being a member, that implied resignation or abandonment of membership should be effective, subject to contrary provisions in the constitution.”
Read the full judgement here.
We are delighted to see our barristers receiving recognition in The Legal 500 (Legalease) 2024 Asia-Pacific rankings.
Andre Zahra SC and Thomas Bagley have been recognised as Leading Senior and Junior Counsel in Commercial Disputes, with Katrina Howard SC being listed as a Leading Silk in TMT and IP law. See the full publication here.
We would like to extend our deepest appreciation to our clients and peers who gave outstanding references and comments, which include the following:
Katrina Howard SC – ‘Katrina is a very quick study in any technology with a particular focus on pharma and biopharma work. She is a tremendous advocate on very tricky scientific cases and presents matters simply and clearly to the court. She is also a fearless advocate.’
Thomas Bagley – ‘Incredible breadth of legal knowledge in a range of practice areas. Strong advocacy skills unled. His advocacy style is calm, measured and focused, leading the Court through the client’s points methodically and purposefully. Very strong in drafting pleadings and submissions.’
